Sunday 13 May 2018

Annabelle: Creation

Cast: Anthony Lapaglia, Samara Lee, Miranda Otto, Lulu Wilson, Talitha Eleana Bateman and Stephanie Sigman.

Director: David F. Sandberg

Release Date: 2017

Running Time: 1hr 49 minutes

Genre: Horror

Rating: 15

Format: Sky Movies

Synopsis:

12 years after the tragic death of their little girl, a dollmaker and his wife welcome a nun and several girls from a shuttered orphanage into their home, where they soon become the target of the dollmakers possessed creation, Annabelle.


















Based on the terrifying true story about a haunted doll named "Annabelle", that still to this day is kept locked away in a museum owned by real life Paranormal investigators, Ed and Lorraine Warren. The most disappointing thing about this film is the fact that none of it is actually based on the true story of Annabelle Higgins. Higgins was murdered and left to rot in a field, none of which is ever mentioned or shown in the movie. Although it ties in with "Annabelle" and "The Conjuring" fairly well, it also steers away from it's terrifying originality. I was terribly dissapointed to know that director James Wan would not be returning to direct "Annabelle" or its prequel. Unfortunately like many horror movies these days, it gets caught up in the hype of Hollywood, filmmakers claim that their film is based on a true story, very rarely are they ever. More often than not, it is done as a publicity stunt.

It's a shame viewers will get more of an adrenaline rush from the documentary on Annabelle Higgins, rather than a movie, that really had the potential to tell the horrifying story in great detail. The movie starts off exceptionally good, your introduced to characters and shown a backstory, it however doesn't take long for the movie to go downhill very quickly. Director David Sandberg has relied on far too many jump scares and predicality, that viewers are left working out the puzzle before they've even been handed it. Understandably this may be why director James Wan turned down the movie, due to it's very poorly written script. The haunted doll that Annabelle is thought to possess in real life was in fact a Raggedy Ann doll, why Sandberg thought the need to change it to a wooden doll is anyone's guess.

Lulu Wilson and Talitha Bateman star as young orphans Linda and Janice, inseparable best friends with a love for dolls. Both deliver very good performances considering the script they were given to work with. It's unfortunate that a few scenes made absolutely no sense, or had nothing to do with the story itself. In one scene a scarecrow comes to life and chases after the orphans girls. Why? It was added purely for the scare factor, which considering the film is a horror makes sense, right? Yes, to a degree, it's sad that all it really did though was make for a very cheesy and irrelevant scene, that had nothing to do with the plot. This movie had so much potential, it was really let down by the script and it's execution.
















The lighting department and set designers are what really make this film work. Although the doll isn't authentic in the way it looks, it's still incredibly creepy too look at. It's unfortunate that director David Sandberg essentially stole a few ideas from James Wan's incredible thriller "Insidious", the demon that lives within the doll looks remarkably like the demon shown in the "Insidious" franchise. Although the CGI is terrific, there was no originality. Sandberg has relied far too much on jump scares and the ideas of other filmmakers to produce a movie that he hoped would be the same quality as "The Conjuring", I'm sorry to say that it was nowhere near as good. James Wan knows how to thrill audiences psychologically, Sandberg still has a long way to go if he really wants to thrill his viewers. Disappointing.

2.5/5 stars

Thursday 10 May 2018

Waterworld

Cast: Kevin Costner, Dennis Hopper, Jeanne Tripplehorn, Robert A.Silverman and Gerard Murphy.

Director: Kevin Reynolds

Release Date: 1995

Running Time: 2hrs 15 minutes

Genre: Adventure

Rating: 12

Format: Netflix

Synopsis:

In the future where the polar ice caps have melted and Earth is almost submerged, a mutated mariner fights starvation and outlaw smokers and reluctantly helps a woman and a young girl find dry land.





















It's been reported that "Waterworld" was one of the worst movies to have been made in the early nineties. Essentially it is "Mad Max" on water, however no two movies are the same, no matter what people may say to you. A fair amount of movie fans dislike the movie due to it's unrealistic storyline. Forgive me, but I don't remember director Kevin Reynolds claiming it to be scientific or to be a representation of the near future. It's a movie. It was made purely for entertainment purposes, not for NASA to analyze at a later date. Unfortunately if you go in with this sort of mindset you never going to enjoy it for what it is. As a member of the audience you are not told what year "Waterworld" is set in, however personally that is what makes it all the more entertaining. It could, essentially be thousand upon thousands of years into the future. As if we have a right to judge what may or may not happen?

In this post apocalyptic waterworld, people are living primarily on boats. How these people came to survive is a mystery, however that's part of the fun. I don't know about you, but I don't always want my questions to be answered. Mariner (Costner) finds himself surrounded by a community of people living on an island made from the rubble of what was once Earth. Helen (Tripplehorn) believes that he knows where dryland is. When their island is attacked by "smokers" Helen and Enola escape with him in search of dryland. A place they believe to still be inhabited by humans. Will they make it there in time though before the thieving "smokers" catch up with them? The "smokers" live on board an old oil tanker, that seems to have an infinite supply of oil and cigarettes. Interestingly, the "smokers" refer to the oil as black stuff. Are they aware of it's full potential?

















Kevin Costner delivers a good performance, although it's not one of his best performances, he slips into the main role of the mariner very well. Costner pulls off action sequences brilliantly and proves once again he's the ultimate hero. Dennis Hopper delivers an excellent performance as Deacon, head of the smokers. Hopper is very good at playing the bad guy, although he found himself type cast throughout most of his career, he had an excellent way of bringing charm and humour to his more often than not, psychopathic characters. Tina Majorino steals the show as young Enola, beautifully innocent and fearless she works excellently alongside Hopper and Costner. Character development is very interesting throughout. As the human race, is this how desperate we would become to find dryland?

Although "Waterworld" certainly wouldn't go down as a piece of art, it should be for it's spectacular cinematography, something that really shouldn't be missed, considering the problems the actors faced during production. It's clear a lot of work went into the production of this film, in making it look as authentic as possible. I found myself asking a lot of questions during the viewing of this film. Where did Mariner get dirt from? Has he actually seen dryland, despite saying he hasn't? Perhaps he didn't want to disappoint others into believing there was more then there actually is? 99% of the Earth is submerged underwater. Does Enola know more than what she is letting on? Sometimes we don't need to know the answers to the questions we ask when viewing a movie for the first time. Half the fun can be trying to figure out what sort of message the director was hoping to give. A lot of effort went into making sure this film made it onto the big screen. Don't judge too harshly, I think you might be pleasantly surprised.

4/5


Saturday 10 February 2018

Baywatch

Cast: Dwayne Johnson, Zac Efron, Alexandra Daddario, Priyanka Chopra, Kelly Rohrbach and Ilfenesh Hadera

Director: Seth Gordan

Release Date: 2017

Running Time: 1hr 52 minutes

Genre: Crime

Rating: 15

Format: Sky Cinema

Synopsis:

Devoted lifeguard Mitch Buchannon butts heads with a brash new recruit, as they uncover a criminal plot that threatens the future of the bay.



What possessed director Seth Gordon to base a movie on the hit tv show "Baywatch", is anyone's business. I'd recommend upon viewing that you don't go in expecting the same thing. In Emerald Bay, Mitch Buchannon (Johnson) and his incredible team of beautifully tanned lifeguards protect the bay. This Summer two new determined recruits will join their team, as well as a challenging former Olympic swimmer, who are all put to the test to prove their skills. Things soon begin to change though when a synthetic street drug begins to make its way into the bay. The Baywatch team must work together undercover to track down the culprit.

The comic timing is remarkably good, considering Dwayne Johnson and Zac Efron are not comically trained actors. The problem however is the storyline, according to Dwayne Johnson, it is a  film that was reportedly not made for critics. With all due respect to Mr Johnson, I'd imagine he was thinking along the lines, it's so bad, it's good! To say it's a disaster is honestly an understatement. Why Seth Gordon felt the need to use a ridiculous amount of foul language is anyone's guess. Does it add more humour to the storyline? Not really, no. Lifeguards all around the world will be turning in their graves at the mere thought that this is how they are being portrayed on screen. I don't honestly know whether to laugh or to be embarrassed for the filmmakers.





















Dwayne Johnson is the only actor to deliver a strong performance, although Efron and Johnson are hilariously funny together, Efron's performance is rather poor in comparison. Was it really necessary to have Pamela Anderson and David Hasselhoff make an appearance in the film? The storyline would have worked excellently if there had been a real feeling of drama in the story, unfortunately it was difficult to take anything seriously with so many cheesy one liners. Alexandra Daddario offers a good performance Summer Quinn, although she doesn't offer much to the storyline. The story skips back and forth to primarily being a film about Mike Brody (Efron) and Mitch Buchannon (Johnson)

The catchy and contemporary soundtrack works surprisingly well, I respect Seth Gordon's choice not to use the original theme. If I'm honest, it would have been a step too far. Although the story works surprisingly well as a comedy, it would have worked better as a drama. Audiences are naturally going to compare it to the original show. It's a shame the special effects looked so poor, it only added to the numerous amount of things wrong with the movie. It is what it is, it's good for a laugh!

3/5 stars

Wednesday 7 February 2018

2001: A Space Odyssey

Cast: Keir Dullea, Gary Lockwood, William Sylvester, Daniel Ritcher and Sean Sullivan.

Director: Stanley Kubrick

Release Date: 1968

Running Time: 2hrs 29 minutes

Genre: Sci Fi

Rating: U

Format: Sky Cinema

Synopsis:

Humanity finds a mysterious, obviously artificial object buried beneath the Lunar surface, and with intelligent computer H.A.L 9000, sets off on a quest.

















Stanley Kubrick stunned audiences around the world when he released one of the most interesting science fiction movies to ever be made fifty-years ago. Film Critics and audiences alike walked out of movie theatres demanding to have some sort of explanation as to what they had just witnessed. Kubrick's intention was never for audiences to understand what was happening, Kubrick wanted audiences to think for themselves as to what they thought was happening. The beauty of this, is that everyone's response will be different. No two people think alike. The entertainment comes from guessing. Thought provoking and visually stunning, Kubrick delivers one of the most spectacular looking Science Fiction films to ever be made.

2001: A Space Odyssey is to be honest a mind boggling experience. The storyline will remind some of Christopher Nolan's "Interstellar", it's anyone's guess as to what exactly Stanley Kubrick was trying to say through this film. With little to no dialogue, Kubrick has left plenty of room for surprises. The story is essentially a journey through evolution. The monoliths (pillars), are tools of a highly advanced alien civilization. They are put into place to influence the evolutionary progression of humanity. Each monolith has a different purpose. Kubrick was fully aware when making the film that each individual watching it would experience a different emotional reaction to the story.
















It's almost impossible to believe that this was shot fifty years ago. The special effects are incredible. Two experienced engineers, spent three years working with Stanley Kubrick from spaceship and interior design to spacesuit designs, to ensure that everything was as authentic as possible. Unfortunately however, there are a few errors with the story. This is one of the only movies, more so at the time that focused on human evolution, technology, artificial intelligence and exterrestrial life. 2001, is strictly a visual experience. It's very unlikely you will find a film anything like this today. The story will have you constantly asking questions.

Of course 2001, is probably more famous today, not for it's storyline, but it's beautiful and transcending score, conducted by Herbert Von Karajan. Frightening and exciting, the score changes dramatically throughout the film. Almost an evolution of music, as the story is explained more. 2001, is a film that everyone should watch at least once, if not for the outstanding soundtrack, but to experience something truly unique through stunning visuals. Magnificent, one that deserves to be in the History books.

5/5 stars


Sunday 4 February 2018

Men of Honor

Cast: Robert De Niro, Cuba Gooding Jr, Charlize Theron, Michael Rapaport and David Keith

Director: George Tillman JR

Release Date: 2000

Running Time: 2hrs 9 minutes

Genre: Drama

Rating: 15

Format: Sky Cinema

Synopsis:

The story of Carl Brashear, the first African-American U.S Navy Diver, and the main who trained him.

















Carl Brashear was the first African-American to become a U.S Navy Master Diver, rising to the position in 1970, despite having an amputated leg. Carl joined the U.S Navy on February 25th 1948, not long after the Navy had been desegregated by U.S President Harry Truman. Graduating from the U.S Navy Diving and Salvage school in 1954, Brashear became the first African-American to attend and graduate from the school. It's upsetting to know that Brashear was so mistreated whilst in the Navy, facing hostility and racism. Carl retired from the U.S Navy in 1979, as a Master Chief Petty Officer and Master Diver. Director George Tillman JR, explains Brashear's life magnificently, not only is it dramatic and inspiring, it's also highly educating for those who are not aware of his heroic actions.

Cuba Gooding Jr stars as Carl Brashear, Gooding delivers an outstanding performance, he really is sensational as Carl Brashear. Gooding not only acts the part, but looks it too, looking the spitting image of Carl. Showing deep emotion in his character, Gooding really gives the audience an insight into what life was like for Carl in the U.S Navy. The constant struggles that Brashear had to face everyday, ridicule, racism, hatred. Robert De Niro delivers a remarkably impressive performance as Master Chief Billy Sunday. Bill Sunday was forced by Mr Pappy to deliberately fail Brashear on more then one occasion, purely because of his race. Cruel and degrading, both characters really empathise the seriousness of the situation that Carl found himself in.


















Charlize Theron stars as Sunday's wife Gwen, although her performance is short but sweet, she looks the part and delivers a good performance. Theron is excellent at showing her thoughts through emotion in her face, You can clearly see she's unhappy, as time goes by you have a strong understanding as to why she feels this way towards her husband. The beauty of the storyline is really  seeing how determined Carl is in becoming a U.S Navy Master Diver, the determination to prove everyone wrong, especially Master Chief Billy Sunday, who is determined to do everything he can to stop him. Carl's story is not only touching, it's incredibly inspiring too. Both Brashear and Sunday find they have similar triumphs and failures.

The storyline is emotional, naturally for some audiences it does touch on sensitive subjects,in order to educate, not to cause offence. It should invoke emotion in you as well as inspire you to believe in yourself and in others that anything is possible if you are determined enough. It's unfortunate that this film is overlooked a bit and didn't do as well at the box office as it probably should have. None the less the story is magnificently and is highly influential. Powerful and emotional, De Niro and Gooding are sensational!

5/5 stars

Saturday 3 February 2018

The Pacifier

Cast: Vin Diesel, Lauren Graham, Faith Ford, Max Thieriot and Brittany Snow

Director: Adam Shankman

Release Date: 2005

Running Time: 1hr 35 minutes

Genre: Comedy

Rating: PG

Format: Sky Cinema

Synopsis:

Having recovered from wounds received in a failed rescue operation, Navy SEAL Shane Wolfe is handed a new assignment: Protect the five Plummer kids from enemies of their recently deceased father - a government scientist whose top secret experiment remains in the kids house.



When Navy SEAL Shane Wolfe fails to save scientist Howard Plummer, who developed a top secret device known as Ghost, he finds himself assigned to look after his five mischievous children. Wolfe however learns that looking after five kids is going to be a lot more challenging then he first anticipated. The storyline is fun and entertaining, with it being a cross between Jackie Chan's "The Spy Next Door" and the "James Bond" series. Vin Diesel takes a step back from being behind the wheel, delivering a strong and disciplined performance as Navy Seal Shane Wolfe. Not a fan of kids, Wolfe soon finds himself in deep water.

Introducing Zoe, Seth, Lulu, Peter and Tyler. Stubborn and naughty, they don't like the idea of a Navy Seal coming in and invading their personal bubbles. Although the storyline is funny and shows a great deal of slapstick, it also focuses on very real and deep issues, including death and grief. The effect that it has on the children and how it becomes apparent that the reason behind their rebelling is due to the grief that they show for their deceased father. Vin Diesel works excellently alongside Brittany Snow and Max Thieriot who star as Zoe and Seth Plummer. Diesel shows that he is capable of taking on comedic roles as much as he is of taking on more dramatic roles too. Proving to be quite the character as Shane Wolfe.

Full of fun and tricks, the storyline is not as cheesy as it may first sound. There are references to "The Sound of Music"and Jackie Chan's stunt team also make a brief appearance. Entertaining and light-hearted, the film is sure to be a hit with families, with the storyline's perfect balance of drama and humour, children will find themselves being able to relate to the Plummer children. A fun and uplifting score coincides with the storyline excellently. The beauty of family films is that they are suitable for everyone. A terrific family film with a fun twist. Vin Diesel is the ultimate family man!

5/5 stars

Thursday 1 February 2018

Air Force One

Cast: Harrison Ford, Gary Oldman, Glenn Close, Wendy Crewson, Liesel Matthews and Xander Berkeley.

Director: Wolfgang Peterson

Release Date: 2hrs 4 minutes

Genre: Action

Rating: 15

Format: Sky Cinema

Synopsis:

Hijackers seize the plane carrying the President of the United States and his family, but he an ex-soldier, works from hiding to defeat them.
















Before there was "Olympus has Fallen" and "London has Fallen", there was Air Force One! Thought to have been inspired by "Die Hard", the President of the United States of America must defend himself and his plane, when it's hijacked by terrorists who are determined to kill someone on board every half an hour unless their demands are met. The terrorists aren't interested in Air Force One, their goal is to merely force the President of the United States to release General Radek, the dictator of a terrorist regime in Turkey, who is currently being held in prison in Moscow. Thrilling and packed full of action, this is definitely one for the adrenaline junkies!

Harrison Ford stars as President James Marshall, a highly intelligent man that finds himself in the arms of terrorists who shrewdly believe that he is no longer on board when they hijack it. Ford delivers a very strong and charismatic performance. He fits into the role very nicely. British actor Gary Oldman however is the man who really steals the show with his fiercely authentic performance as Russian terrorist Ivan Korshunov. Deeply terrifying and straight to the point, Oldman's performance really is outstanding. The only really disappointing aspect to the story and the film is that we do not see a great deal from other characters, the story primarily focuses on James Marshall, Vice President Kathryn Bennett and Ivan Korshunov.


















It's fairly obvious that director Wolfgang Petersen was inspired by "Die Hard", more so from the second film in which a airport is held hostage by a group of terrorists who are planning to rescue a drug lord from justice. The plots are very similar, however the film stood out at the time due to it's thrilling and action packed storyline. The beauty of the film is that most if not all of the film is shot on Air Force One. Wolfgang Petersen was initially denied access until Harrison Ford asked for permission and things soon changed. The special effects looks excellent, although Peterson hasn't relied on them a great deal which has gone in his favour in making the film look more authentic. Chances are they will never make a film quite like this again, out of fear that a story will press on sensitive subjects, as we are now post 9/11.

Fantastically action packed from beginning to end!

4.5/5 stars

Saturday 27 January 2018

Duel

Cast: Dennis Weaver, Jacqueline Scott and Eddie Firestone

Director: Steven Spielberg

Release Date: 1971

Running Time: 1hr 30 minutes

Genre: Thriller

Rating: 12

Format: Blu-Ray

Synopsis:

A business commuter is pursued and terrorized by the malevolent driver of a massive oil tanker. 


















Directorial debut of oscar winning director Steven Spielberg. Business commuter David Mann (Weaver) finds himself on a psychological and thrilling journey, when the driver of an oil tanker tries to kill him, forcing him off the road at every chance he gets. Despite the film being cast as a TV movie, Duel really delivers a unique cinematic experience to audiences, it's exceptionally rare that you will experience anything quite like it today. Spielberg's short but clever masterpiece really is a piece of cinematic history. Spielberg proved very early on in his career that he had a very bright future ahead of him!

Dennis Weaver stars as business commuter David Mann, who finds himself  tormented by a psychopathic oil tanker driver. One of whom you never get to see. Part of the psychological terror is that you only ever get to see the drivers arms and feet. Clever and thought-provoking, you find yourself constantly asking questions. Why is this man so passionate about killing David? Who is he? Is he just paranoid? Is this man a serial killer? Has he killed others before David? The excitement really comes from Dennis's spectacular performance to reason with himself, why this is all happening? David just wants to get home, however he finds himself being hunted down by an unknown stranger.





















The beauty of this psychological thriller is that it really proves  you don't need fancy special effects to thrill audiences. The thrill doesn't come from what you do see, but more from what you don't see. The ultimate car chase, between cat and mouse. Who will win? Who will die? Spielberg terrifically teases audiences throughout the film to hint as to what is really happening and what may have happened in the past with the oil tanker. Magnificently shot from beginning to end. Unfortunately one that seems to go amiss among film collectors, but most certainly one that shouldn't be missed by die hard psychological thriller collectors. Terrifying.

5/5 stars


Saturday 20 January 2018

A.I.Artificial Intelligence

Cast: Haley Joel Osment, Jude Law, Frances O'Connor, Sam Robards, William Hurt and Jack Angel.

Director: Steven Spielberg

Release Date: 2001

Running Time: 2hrs 26 minutes

Genre: Science Fiction

Rating: 12

Format: Sky Cinema

Synopsis:

A highly advanced robotic boy longs to become real, so that he can regain the love of his human mother. 


















Haley Joel Osment delivers one of the most outstanding child performances of the early naughties in Steven Spielberg's deep and diverse science fiction story, A.I. Artificial Intelligence. Based on the short story "Supertoys last all summer long" by Brian Aldiss. In the near and distant future the polar ice caps have melted, the oceans have drowned out all the coastal cities of the world. The human race keeps evolving, to the point of creating realistic robots known as Mechas to serve them. One the mecha building companies designs David, an artificial child who has the ability to have real feelings for his human mother Monica. However when Monica's real son comes home from hospital, David's life begins to change rapidly.

The storyline has certainly been inspired by the popular fairytale "Pinocchio", although it sounds complex, the storyline is actually very easy to follow. Director Steven Spielberg and writer Ian Watson haven't missed a second of creating a futuristic version of the beloved fairytale. Haley Joel Osment delivers a sensational performance as David. The first of its kind, an artificial child who has the ability to love like humans do. On his adventures David meets many other Mecha's, one of whom is Gigolo Joe played tremendously by Jude Law. Both Osment and Law are fantastically robotic like in their characteristics and their physical movements. The idea to have them not blink only added more terrific characterisation to their roles.



















The storyline works tremendously well because it doesn't go into great detail about Mecha, too many science fiction films make the mistake of adding too much of a backstory in the making of their machines that ends up boring audiences early on in the film. Spielberg really made sure to focus on the characters themselves, not the fact that they are robots living in a human world. Magnificently shot, the world that David and Joe live in is a almost a combination of the post apocalyptic world in "Waterworld" and "Blade Runner", if you want to dive into the storyline really deep, they could all hypothetically be linked, with the story being set in 2142 and 4142, it really doesn't sound all that impossible.

Composer John Williams delivers a beautiful score that sparks emotion and thrills audiences as they watch the story of a young robot called David search for the blue fairy in the hope that she can turn him into a human boy. Heartwarming and sweet, the story will reach out to many on an emotional level as much as it will thrill you. Although not deemed a success at the box office, it is by far one of Spielberg's most impressive and most in depth films, that will leave you walking away asking plenty of questions. Science fiction fans won't be dissapointed.

5/5 stars

Wednesday 17 January 2018

50 movie tag questions (2018)

So I thought I'd do a more up to date version of this, as my choice in films is always changing and naturally of course I am seeing lots of new films all the time too (I will get around to reviewing them at some point), thank you so much for continuing to read my blog, I am growing and learning as a film critic everyday and really understanding the importance of reading just as much as a I watch to help improve my writing skills. 

1. How often do you watch a movie? 

It honestly depends on how busy I am with work and my family. Lately it's been one a day, sometimes every other day. If I am watching a very complex film that I wish to review, I might watch it more then once to make sure I full understand the plot and the purpose of the film.

2. What movie genre are you particularly fond of? 

Recently I've really been going back to my childhood and watching simple family films (as you may have noticed by my two most recent reviews), I've always loved family films, films that were just meant for entertainment, nothing else.

3. What was the last film you watched and liked? 

My fiance and myself very recently went to see "The Greatest Showman" starring Hugh Jackman and Zac Efron. It's honestly one of the best musicals I've seen in a very long time. It was everything a musical should be and so much more. I cannot recommend it enough, especially if you enjoy musicals.

4. What was the last movie you watched and hated? 

Nikolaj Arcel's "The Dark Tower", I didn't find it particularly entertaining, it really lacked depth and storyline. I'm yet to see a Stephen King adaptation that is really fantastic.

5. What is your favourite movie of all time? 

I really love "Space Jam" it just brings back fantastic memories of my childhood. I've seen it hundreds upon hundreds of times.

6. Your most favourite guilty pleasure movie? 

To be honest if I really like something, I'm not ashamed of admitting it. I really love "George of the Jungle" starring Brendan Fraser. It was a film I always watched with my little sister when we were tiny. It's so tongue in cheek, but it's excellent.

7. What movie/movies have you seen millions of times? 

The Addams Family, Space Jam, Indiana Jones: Raiders of the Lost Ark, A Bug's Life and The Parent Trap, to name a few.

8. Are you the type of person to go and see a movie on it's first day of showing? 

Unfortunately where I live, we're actually the last to get a film on its initial release as it attends other cinema's first. I actually prefer a quieter cinema so I can concentrate on the film, there's nothing worse than going to a really busy showing and not being able to here the film because people are talking and being rude.

9. Do you use fandango or do you book your movie tickets? 

Depending on what we're seeing, my fiance and myself will normally book tickets in advance.

10. Cinema, Blu-Ray or download? 

I try and see what I can at the cinema, my fiance and myself are currently putting money towards a mortgage so naturally that must come first. I have NowTV, for those that don't live in the UK, Sky basically allow customers to view movies online, for a tiny price. Sky Cinema allows me to watch thousands of films, so lots to choose from.

11. How often do you go to the cinema to see a movie? 

Approximately twice a month, depending on if we can afford it and what's showing.

12. What are some movies that made you cry? 

We bought a Zoo, Goodbye Mr Tom and Titanic.

13. Do you watch foreign movies? 

I do indeed.

14. What is one of your favourite foreign films?

Downfall. A German movie with subtitles about Hitler's last few days, I'd highly recommend, it's deeply fascinating.

15. Who are some of your favourite directors? 

Gene Kelly, Steven Spielberg and James Cameron.

16. Are you particular with movie scores/soundtracks?

I really love movie scores they can tell so much about a story. Depending on the film it can really make or break a movie.

17. What movie score can be found on your Spotify playlist? 

The Greatest Showman score. I can't get it out of my head. It's excellent.

18. Have you ever watched a movie alone at a cinema? 

I haven't no.

19. What is the best chick flick film for you? 

One of my favourites is "The Princess Diaries" starring Anne Hathaway.

20. Is there a movie that changed your perspective on life? 

It depends to be honest, some are more thought-provoking them others. I found "Interstellar" very insightful.

21. Your favourite comic book movie? 

Spider-Man: Homecoming, it's one of my favourite Marvel films.

22. DC or Marvel Films? 

Marvel, although I've really enjoyed a couple of DC Films, I much prefer binging on Marvel films.

23. What are the movies in top 10 IMDB list that you have watched? 

The Dark Knight, Schindler's List, Pulp Fiction and Lord of the Rings: Return of the King.

24. Do you ever watch movie critic reviews online before watching or purchasing a film? 

If I know it isn't going to contain spoilers, absolutely. I'm curious to know what other people think, just like myself my reviews aren't there to tell you what to do, but they might help you decide.

25. What is the best movie adaptation of a book? 

All of the "Harry Potter" films.

26. What a movie before reading the book or visa versa? 

It depends to be honest. I've done both in the past. I'm currently reading the first Harry Potter book, I watched the movie first.

27. What is your most favourite comedy movie? 

The Nutty Professor starring Jerry Lewis.

28. Drama movie? 

Goodbye Christopher Robin, I learnt a lot about both of their lives from watching it.

29. Western movie? 

I need to actually see one first.

30. Romantic comedy? 

Breakfast at Tiffany's. I love Audrey Hepburn.

31. Horror film? 

Insidious. It's honestly one of the most well made horrors that I've seen in a very long time.

32. Sports movie? 

Rookie of the Year. I seem to have an obsession with family films at the moment.

33. Sci Fi film? 

Blade Runner. I'm still trying to make my mind up about Blade Runner 2049.

34. Action movies? 

James Cameron's "The Terminator" its one of my favourites and haunts me everytime I view it.

35. Who is your favourite movie couple? 

Julie Andrews and Dick Van Dyke (Not quite, but they're awesome)

36. Any movie character you can relate to? 

Pocahontas.

37. If you were only to watch five movies for the rest of your life what would they be? 

The Addams Family, A Bug's Life, Terminator, Spider-Man: Homecoming and Mary Poppins.

38. Favourite war movie? 

Dunkirk. It's outstanding.

39. Your least favourite movie of all time? 

Paranormal Activity. I'm sorry to say they really don't entertain me.

40. Have you ever watched a movie based on the lead actress or actor? 

No.

41. What movie did you expect to be good, but found it was awful?

Paranormal Activity. At the time of it's release people were telling me it was the scariest film they'd ever seen, they were having nightmares. I Was really disappointed.

42. Favourite movie character of all time? 

Mulan. She's just incredible. The story is incredibly inspiring and emotional too.

43. Favourite movie villain? 

Darth Vader.

44. Any movie sequel you are still waiting for? 

I'm very excited to see what James Cameron has in store for us with Avatar 2.

45. Ever made a movie review? 

Hmmm.......

46. Star Wars or Star Trek? 

Star Trek.

47. Right, think of any movie, what comes first? 

The Matrix. I am going to be reviewing it shortly.

48. Favourite movie lines? 

"Your gonna need a bigger boat" - Jaws

"Iceberg right ahead" -Titanic

"I am Groot..I am Groot" - Guardians of the Galaxy 2

49. TV series, Books, Movies, Computer games in order of interest? 

Movies, Books, TV Series and Computer Games.

50. Lastly if your life story was to be made into a movie, who would you like to portray you, who would be directing and what would be the title? 

Director James Cameron, hypothetically, Audrey Hepburn and the title would be The Secret life of me :)


Scooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed

Cast: Sarah Michelle Gellar, Freddie Prinze Jr, Matthew Lillard, Linda Cardellini, Seth Green and Peter Boyle.

Director: Raja Gosnell

Release Date 2004

Running Time: 1hr 29 minutes

Genre: Family/Comedy

Rating: PG

Format: Sky Cinema

Synopsis:

The Mystery Inc gang must save Coolsville from an attack of past unmasked monsters brought to life by an evil masked figure trying to "unmask" the gang. 


























After the success of the first film it was only natural that director Raja Gosnell would attempt a sequel. Is it as entertaining as the first? Unfortunately not. Although the storyline excellently stresses on the terrific imagination of the original cartoon, the idea to modernise it through the use of contemporary music has somewhat ruined it's authenticity. The characters have grown and developed since the first story. We can understand from the length of Fred's hair and their newly equipped lab that perhaps a few months have passed since the events that took place in the first film? The idea to use key references from the cartoon have worked excellently. It's unfortunate that the storyline is rather messy.

When Coolsville is attacked by past unmasked monsters, the Mystery Inc team must work together to find the culprit. Is their evil nemesis behind it, or is it the museum owner? It's unfortunate that Freddie Prinze Jr is the only actor to deliver a strong performance. Sarah Michelle Gellar, Matthew Lillard and Linda Cardellini all appeared to be rushing their lines. Matthew Lillard in particular really looked like he was forcing his character, instead of giving a very natural and genuine performance as Shaggy. Considering how excellent his performance was in the first film this was very disappointing. Seth Green delivers a somewhat interesting performance as museum owner Patrick Wisely.

Although the special effects in hindsight are very clever, they still don't look excellent. Scenes involving CGI unfortunatly look rushed and messy, giving the impression that a lot of effort didn't go into making it look good. The first film really took audiences back to the cartoon's original roots in terms of special effects and characterisation. More often than not, sequels work exceptionally well, however sometimes they are best left alone. The storyline really didn't need modernising. Really quite disappointing, it's no surprise really that another film wasn't made shortly after.

2.5 stars

Monday 15 January 2018

Scooby-Doo: The Movie

Cast: Freddie Prinze Jr, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Rowan Atkinson, Matthew Lillard, Linda Cardellini and Isla Fisher.

Director: Raja Gosnell

Release Date: 2002

Running Time: 1hr 23 minutes

Genre: Family

Rating: PG

Format: Sky Cinema

Synopsis:

After an spontaneous break up, the Mystery Inc gang are individually brought to an island resort to investigate strange goings on.
























Joe Ruby and Ken Spears hit animated cartoon series "Scooby-Doo" has been loved by fans across the globe for the past forty-nine years. In the early naughties it was announced that a live action version would be hitting our cinema screens. Director Brian Levant delivered a terrific live action adaptation of "The Flintstones" in 1994, proving that a great director really can bring a cartoon to life. The beauty of live action adaptations is that it allows younger viewers to see their favourite characters on the big screens. When the Mystery Inc spontaneously split, they find themselves reunited after two years boarding a plane to Spooky Island to investigate strange goings on! Daphne, Fred, Velma, Shaggy and Scooby must work together as a team to find out who the colporate is.

The entertaining storyline really brings back the imagination of the original cartoon series. Quick and fun it's everything you'd expect from a live adaptation. Freddie Prinze Jr, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Matthew Lillard and Linda Cardellini all deliver fantastic performances, with an uncanny likeness to their characters. Rowan Atkinson is excellent as Spooky Island owner Mondavarious. Wonderfully exaggerated, he adds a tremendous amount of humour to the storyline, with terrific witty one liners. Real life couple, Freddie Prinze Jr and Sarah Michelle Gellar work beautifully together as Fred and Daphne, making their characters all the more authentic.

Scooby-Doo looks wonderfully authentic, the CGI to create his character is really magnificent. Hardcore fans of the original show will not find themselves dissapointed. Although there are a couple of editing mishaps and continuity errors, the film itself looks terrific, with a real homage to the original cartoon series. Silly and fun, packed full of intricate details that reference the original characters, the story is perfectly suited for family's and children of all ages. Wonderfully funny and entertaining.

4/5 stars

Friday 12 January 2018

Get Out

Cast: Daniel Kaluuya, Allison Williams, Catherine Keener, Bradley Whitford, Marcus Henderson and Caleb Landry Jones.

Director: Jordan Peele

Release Date: 2017

Running Time: 1hr 40 minutes

Genre: Indie/Horror

Rating: 15

Format: Sky Cinema

Synopsis:

It's time for a young African-American to meet his white girlfriend's parents for a weekend in their secluded estate in the woods, but before long, the friendly and polite ambience will give way to a nightmare.

The premise behind a horror story is primarily to frighten or thrill an individual. Very few are as thought-provoking as this one. Jordan Peele's directorial debut not only scares you in all the right places it also allows you to think outside the box. The story doesn't frighten you through violence or gore, it hits you on a psychological level. Hopefully if your like myself, you won't be surprised until the end of the film when you understand what is actually going on. Daniel Kaluuya gives such a outstanding performance that he really allows you to come on this journey with him as Chris. This is so much more than a story about a cabin in the woods.

For a first time director, Jordan Peele has delivered a horror film, that experienced directors have always longed for. Allison Williams, Catherine Keener, Bradley Whitford and Caleb Landry Jones all give such fantastic performances you really find yourself hypnotised by their characters, their intentions, their purpose, only to find yourself proved wrong right at the very end. What has just happened? How did I not figure this out to be begin with? Figuring out what is happening is part of the fun. There is nothing predictable about the storyline. The idea to shoot the film all in one area is what makes the film all the more thought-provoking. Is Chris dreaming? Does his girlfriend and her family really exist? Who are these other people that we see?

As the story continues, you find yourself putting together pieces of the puzzle. As a film critic this is most definitely a film that you do not want to give the storyline away too anyone. It will undoubtedly ruin it for any individual who has no idea what to expect when they watch it for the first time. Beautifully shot and full of emotion, drama, humour and suspense. Director Jordan Peele has without a doubt delivered one of the most thought-provoking horror films to date. Full of surprises, absolutely outstanding!

5/5 stars


Wednesday 10 January 2018

IT: Chapter One

Cast: Bill Skarsgard, Jaeden Lieberher, Jeremy Ray Taylor, Sophia Lillis, Finn Wolfhard, Jack Dylan Grazer and Chosen Jacobs.

Director: Andy Muschietti

Release Date: 2017

Running Time: 2hrs 9 minutes

Genre: Horror/Thriller

Rating: 15

Synopsis:

A group of bullied kids come together when a shape-shifting creature, taking the appearance of a clown, begins hunting children.

Thirty-two years ago, author Stephen King released one of the most terrifying novels to ever enter bookstores! Unexpectedly making it a worldwide phenomenon success. The story begins in 1988, on a cold and stormy afternoon, little George Denbrough is killed by an insidious creature lurking in the sewers of Derry, Maine. Haunted by the death of his brother Bill is determined to find out who or what killed him. The creature presents itself differently to each individual. The first chapter is primarily about six friends Bill, Mike, Richie, Eddie, Stanley and Ben, who are determined once and for all to kill the malevolent creature.

The novel is incredibly hard to follow mainly due to the fantastic intricate details that Stephen King put into place to describe each character. It's unfortunate that many of these details were left out of the film. Understandably a film is never going to live up to the standards of a novel, as a filmmaker you are stuck with the challenge of interpreting someone's imagination on screen. What can be described in written work, cannot always be interpreted the same on screen. Director Andy Muschietti chose to modernise the story, choosing to set the story in 1988-1989 instead of 1957-1958 that was originally described in the book.

Terrifying in appearance and in character, Bill Skarsgard delivers a terrific performance as IT. It's unfortunate however that his character in the film is not quite as described in the book. His appearance has been slightly altered. The six main leads deliver very good performances, particularly "Stranger Things" star Finn Wolfhard. The characters are very accurately portrayed as they are described in the novel. It was however, a disappointment to see that certain characters have been removed from the story. This is was most likely put into place due to the length of the film. Although the film works well without these characters, it also meant a lot of suspense was removed from the storyline.

Hair-raising and electrifying, the setting and the special effects really meet the expectations of a successful horror film. The stunning landscape of Canada works excellently for the description of the town in which the story is set. Entertaining and thrilling, director Andy Muschietti has created a fantastic first chapter to this terrifying film. One of the best adaptations of Stephen King's frightening novel "IT", a story about fear, discovery and friendship. Audiences are anticipated in seeing what Muschietti has next in store for us in the second chapter later next year! Excellent.

4/5 stars

Friday 5 January 2018

Kong: Skull Island

Cast: John Goodman, Tom Hiddleston, Samuel L.Jackson, Brie Larson, John C. Reilly and Corey Hawkins.

Director: Jordan Vogt-Roberts

Release Date: 2017

Running Time: 1hr 51 minutes

Genre: Action/Fantasy

Rating: 12

Format: Sky Cinema

Synopsis:

A brave team of scientists explore an uncharted island in the pacific, venturing into the domain of the mighty Kong, and must fight to escape a primal Eden.

In 2014, Warner Brothers announced the creation of the Monsterverse. A fictional universe that would be centered around monster films featuring King Kong and Godzilla. This is the second film in a series of instalments to enter the Monsterverse. This is a reboot, it is not connected to any previous films centered around the character of Kong. Set in 1973 a team of scientists and Vietnam war soldiers embark on a journey to Skull Island, an uncharted island in the Pacific, where they soon encounter hair raising creatures. Ancient species that were on Earth long before humans are standing strong to take over once again.

The concept of the storyline is very similar to that of Michael Crichton's "Jurassic Park", there is an uninhabited island full of ancient creatures. How was it that they came to be there? Why are they all so dominant? The storyline is not only interesting but thought provoking too. A real story of discovery. Are these ancient creatures really out to hurt them or are they simply trying to protect them from evil that lives on the island? The characters unfortunately are not so well executed. John Goodman, Samuel L.Jackson, John C.Reilly and Tom Hiddleston are the only four actors to portray their characters fantastically. The other characters unfortunately hold little to no significance to the storyline. One character in particular is seen on screen continuously, but to our disappointment doesn't speak a word. What is he doing there?

Director Jordan Vogt-Roberts has certainly taken some inspiration from  Francis Ford Coppola's hit war film "Apocalypse now", although the idea works very well with the storyline, in adding music to intense fighting scenes  it also leaves no room for originality. There is however a tremendous amount of humour that works terrifically to defuse the tension amid the chaos on the island. Reilly delivers particularly good comic timing, Reilly plays a a soldier who has been on the island since 1944, with no understanding that a man has stepped foot on the moon or as to why there is a cold war with Russia. It becomes apparent that the humans invading the island are the real enemies.

The special effects and CGI are very impressive, each creature has been very well thought out and presented on screen. Blending in some of the creatures to a natural habitat worked excellently, it allowed room for surprises when introducing these creatures to audiences. Primarily shot in Vietnam and Hawaii, both locations work well with the idea that the storyline takes place just after the end of the Vietnam war. Director Jordan Vogt-Roberts explained that he  wanted the film to feel like "Apocalypse now", with monsters. The score really allows this to come to fruition. A good start to the monsterverse, however there is certainly room for improvement.

4/5 stars

Wednesday 3 January 2018

The Greatest Showman

Cast: Hugh Jackman, Michelle Williams, Zac Efron, Zendaya and Rebecca Ferguson.

Director: Michael Gracey

Release Date: 2018

Running Time: 1hr 45 minutes

Genre: Drama/Musical

Rating: PG

Format: Theatrical Cinema Release

Synopsis:

Inspired by the imagination of P.T Barnum. An original musical that celebrates the beginning of show business and how it became a worldwide sensation.



















Roll up! Roll up! Director Michael Gracey takes us into the magical and magnificent world of the circus! Inspired by the true story of P.T Barnum's sensational creation the Barnum and Bailey Circus and the lives of their incredible star attractions. Barnum takes a leap of faith when the company he works for goes bankrupt, with a bank loan he builds the Barnum American Museum. Enlisting in the help of unique artists including trapeze artists, a bearded lady and the dog boy, the museum soon becomes a hit making ringleader  P.T Barnum a household name. This marks the directorial debut of Michael Gracey who up until now was only an animator and visual effects supervisor. Gracey should be highly praised in his first effort as a director.

Directing a musical is a very risky move for any director, particularly those who are new to the art. Although it may have a "High School Musical" sound to it, it works very well as a modern musical. Wonderfully inspiring, the story and the musical numbers have been beautifully executed. Hugh Jackman has proved once again that he is more than just a Wolverine. Fully immersing himself into the role of P.T Barnum, Jackman delivers a tremendous performance. Michelle Williams stars as Barnum's wife Charity Barnum. Strained by the effort that Barnum puts into his circus, Charity remains by is side at all times with their two girls Caroline and Helen.




















The characters are what really make this film work. The charming friendship that P.T Barnum forms with playwright Philip Carlyle (Efron), the troubles that each of the unique artists go through, tormented by locals who wish them rid of their town, there is a terrific amount of realism to the story. Jackman shows such true emotion in his eyes that really allows you to feel connected to his character. Efron and Jackman work fantastically alongside one another, sparking off each other brilliantly. You can really feel the magic in their performances. The dance choreography is stunning, it's fantastic to watch, it really makes you feel like you are sat there live watching these incredible artists.

Filled full of outstanding musical performances, "The Greatest Showman" shows true musical originality. Justin Paul and Benj Pasek deliver one of the most inspirational and uplifting scores to ever be heard on screen in recent years. A score so catchy audiences will find themselves rushing home to purchase the soundtrack. A risk worth taking. Beautifully heartwarming, inspiring and packed full of fun. A film you really don't want to miss this coming New Year!

5/5 stars

Tuesday 2 January 2018

The Lost City of Z

Cast: Robert Pattinson, Tom Holland, Charlie Hunnam, Sienna Miller and Edward Ashley.

Director: James Gray

Release Date: 2016

Running Time: 2hrs 21 minutes

Genre: Adventure/Drama

Rating: 15

Format: Amazon Prime UK

Synopsis:

A true story about British explorer Col Percival Fawcett who dissapeared while searching for a mysterious city in the Amazon in the 1920's.

















This is the incredible true story about British explorer Percival Fawcett (Hunman) who embarked into the Amazon at the beginning of the 20th century and discovered what he believed to be evidence of a previously unknown civilization that may have once inhabited there. Forced to leave his family, Fawcett enters the trenchtrious jungles of the Amazon Rainforest with fellow adventurer Henry Costin. Much to the belief of some audiences, the story primarily focuses on the characters not the adventure itself. Director James Gray has taken a very unique approach to shooting the film. Not only did Gray write the screenplay but he also took challenges and risks in ensuring that the film looked authentic and genuine.

The story goes into extensive detail about character relationship and development, spanning over a period of nearly twenty-years. The beauty of the storyline is that it shows the Amazon in its purest form, explaining the dangers of the forest and unknown territories. The Amazon is home to natives who are naturally very protective of their land. The time period has been captured beautifully with period costumes and interior. Charlie Hunnam delivers a very precise performance with strong characterisation as Major Percival Fawcett. Hunman not only looks the part, but sounds it too, with a very well spoken tone. Unfortunately Robert Pattinson's character Henry Costin was a little bit disappointing, although Pattinson took on the role of someone much older then himself exceptionally well, his character really didn't contribute to the storyline very much, Pattinson sadly didn't offer a great deal of characterisation.


















The story explains the troubles between characters, they experience a "Cabin Fever" atmosphere whilst in search of the lost city, food is stollen and ruined, characters become very sick from the environment and humidity. Director James Gray made sure not to glamorise it in any shape or form for the sake of film. Despite the story spanning over a period of almost twenty-years, we don't see much of a difference in Percival Fawcett. Everyone ages gradually, but there would be some significant changes, Charlie Hunnam looks miraculously young for someone who has aged twenty odd years. His children have grown up? Why hasn't he?  Did he enter the fountain of youth in the Amazon?

The film is beautifully shot, James Gray deciding against digital formats have saved the film to some extent. Shooting in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta jungle in Columbia was a risky move for many a reason, however it really allowed the actors to act authentically in the environment. Their reactions to the environment around them are genuine and real, which adds a tremendous amount of realism to the story. There is a fantastic amount of mystery that surrounds the story, it's really quite thought provoking. The decision to not show the audience too much too soon is what really allows the audience to remain gripped. The excitement is in their journey, not what they come to find. A real adventure.

3.5/5 stars

Annabelle: Creation

Cast: Anthony Lapaglia, Samara Lee, Miranda Otto, Lulu Wilson, Talitha Eleana Bateman and Stephanie Sigman. Director: David F. Sandberg ...